Recently as I was reviewing for the ACTs, of the low hanging fruit questions was one that asked to solve for the mean of a set of numbers by hand. Formally, given an n-tuple $x=(x_1,…,x_i,…,x_n)$, I needed to solve for

But this method takes more time as the numbers get larger. This question shouldn’t take longer than a few seconds so a quicker method would be more efficient.

I considered and then used this formula:

The proof for is exceedingly simple:

If you are internally laughing at the triviality of this concept, I concur. Do not make a fundamental attribution error by assuming that my mathematical abilities are limited to this complexity. That I find this worth posting is indicative of the long ways I have to grow and deepen my mathematical understanding.

My true intent in writing this post was to practice my mathjax skills and to share a quick idea I had. If I don’t have time to write about deep ideas, at least I will have shared simpler ones because $1>0$